Lent them to someone or it ended up missing some other way. Rough Guide. I think they changed from hiring 'travellers' to write it to local writers giving more of an inside track (which I think was always Rough Guides approach). The old idea was a load of budget hotels, restaurants, sights, etc, then a few mid range then maybe a top end (although if somewhere like India, top end was still within many peoples budget). we use cookies to improve your experience on our website. But that could be a misperception. If I was interested in going to a country, I would go to the library, borrow the book and could then work out how feasible it was to travel there. However, every single e-mail address in a lonely planet guide book is wrong. I preferred the Footprint guides in South America and India but honestly no guide book can be definitive, entirely up-to-date and without flaws. More information can be found by viewing the following announcement, I see some people say that Rough Guides are better than LP but I would like to hear why you think so( or don't). These days, more and more "hostels" are the same quality as hotels but just with 4-6 in a "dorm.". All rights reserved. Good to read and informative, but all the info was mixed up in the text. Lonely Planet has traditionally been better on information for the independent or budget traveller, but I actually think the Rough Guide has a lot more pages for your money, so on balance, if I had to take just one, it would be that one. Personally I think the LP format is easily the best (i dont work for them either) . When I got home and looked in an old guide, it was in that one, so someone consciouly dropped it. I find the Rough Guides are not just a pocket travel guide, there's quite a lot of background history for the countries/regions in question which I … Too upmarket for me so I found a great Govt budget one a block back. Lonely Planet is much more thorough than Rough Guide. The Lonely Planet Guide To Crete and the Rough Guide To Crete are, in my view, the two best general guidebooks to the island of Crete. I also like the "Let's Go" series. Frommer's Guides : The granddaddy of travel publishing, Arthur Frommer has reinvented his series to be leaner and more focused on the budget traveler. They expanded but still kept the orig budget feel. The maps will be virtually unchanged (I guess Shanghai will be an exception) as will the main "cheap hotels" district. And none of them are up to much when it comes to cycle touring. Why? Thorn Tree forum Interest forums On Your Bike. Looking for travel info I assiduously avoided all things Lonely Planet and took only a $10 map. Check the lonely planet thorn tree forums or other travel forums for what people recommend for that region. Hi there, In the latest Vietnam LP book, I went to Ben Tre a Delta town and the only hotels listed were 2 upmarket river side ones. We went to south America last fall. Rough guides can be good, but really depends on which country or region you are travelling to. I was only going to Reykjavik which I already know quite well and so didn’t really need a guide … If your not going up north thats the one, you can get updates on this site. On the whole more people have more money these days. Lonely Planet and Rough Guide are the two most recommended guides from what I've heard. The info in the various guidebooks is basically the same. I have read Lonely Planet online, not the book. I just want to know about what to see, how to get there, where to sleep etc. OK a bit of a cop out compared to my earlier method of getting my atlas and just following a route. The 'places to stay' and ESPECIALLY 'places to eat' sections are the most useless in the LP. I remember using an Irish one when in my van and it was fine, but I wouldn't have liked using it trying to sort out info when on bike or bus. I have use the LPs for over 30 years and used to love them. Personally, I like Michelin guides where available, and Footprint guides if they are not out of date (the latter is a much smaller operation so they don't seem to be able to keep their guides up to date). Lonely Planet travel guides cost around $22 for city/small area guides, and $25 to $30 for country guides. Lonely Planet has just published a new edition (May 2011) of its Norway guide. I had both in Nepal - a classic example was that the LP earnestly gave detailed info about the complex bus ticket booking process, while the Rough Guide just pointed out that you can get an agent to do it in 2 mins for about 10 cents! Agree with all the above.... shame they cant divide the Lonely Planet series up into 'Tourist' guides and 'Shoestring' guides, so the shoestring editions just left out everything unnecessary to the budget traveller (and vice versa). Right I finished pluggin LP unless they send me some cash! 2020 Who remembers the good old days without email & the internet when all you had was an out of date book and a fellow travellers word of mouth? I did better by choosing my own or asking my accommodation for recommendations. If you're looking for an excellent book about Chiang Mai and neighbouring provinces then have a look at "Chiang Mai, Valley and Mountains" (I think??? Not much in it either way really. Lonely planet vs. Or better yet, just read a book about it. Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet guides, your opinion. I have used a lot of…. They're handy for planning and finding a place when you first arrive but once you're on the road it's easy enough to get a feel for what you're looking for - and other travelers can fill you in with far more reliable info. 4 years ago. Lonely Planet. We didn't visit the Algarve or Alentejo, concentrating on Lisbon and north. Copy and paste the url below to share the link. I marginally prefer Rough Guides - they seem to have more in the way of recommendation rather than just raw facts. Copy and paste the url below to share the link. I have used Rough Guides in the past (not for Thailand though) and like them very much.They all have their good and bad points. I'm sure you'd be fine with one or the other. Please feel free to browse existing topics for answers to your travel questions. Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet guides, your opinion? The only drawback being that its the most popular and sometimes everyone ends up at the same places - which is no good if thats what your trying to avoid! Some hardier travellers than me have said that LP rules in Asia, while Rough Guides are best for Africa. They don't add a lot of information. I only ever bring half a R.G back. This is more current than any guide when it comes to accommodation. Rough Guide is fine for maps and directions, and I preferred it to the Lonely Planet Japan guide as it seemed a bit more detailed. I used to flick through the LP for Ireland quite a lot - up to about 2000, it was rubbish - bad advice, out of date information, but the most recent editions have been excellent. I first noticed this back in 2003 with the S India book, the 2nd edition omitted many of the cheaper places. Publishers are well aware of what #4 says.. A quick count on my bookshelf and there are 23 there. I can do without cooking classes, homosexual hangouts and LP telling me to behave ecologically and politically responsible. Lonely Planet Thailand writer vs The Rough Guide to Thailand writers. I think it's probably a very personal choice - Rough Guides suit me but I know others who would always choose Lonely Planet. Slow day or what....Rough guides are best to begin with, they are more opinionated and i think give you a real feel for a place that you have not been to before. Between the two, for a traveller on a budget, using public transport, Rough Guide is better. Lonely Planet Japan 205: 26% Rough Guides Japan 46: 6% Fodor's Japan 40: 5% Frommer's Japan 43: 5% Gateway to Japan 88: 11% Let's Go Japan 123: 16% Eyewitness Travel Japan 67: 9% Michelin Japan 21: 3% Other 149: 19% It just depends on your preference for the layout of the information. If you try the others you might get to some places not everyones been! Nonetheless, the modern books are definitely less relevant to me, so I will look more closely at the RGs. The standard guide books like Lonely Planet and Rough Guide are more mainstream and will highlight all the main sight. One thing about LP is that they tend to produce updates more frequently. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission. You can Lonely Planet vs Rough Guides (Iceland) A comparative review of the Rough Guide and Lonely Planet guides to Iceland. You can I went through 3 of those books.. I like to stand by my Lonely Planet guide (I like the overall layout and they way they list accomodations based on price), but I'd recommend taking a look through the Rough Guide to make your own opinion. Enter custom title (optional) This topic is … © 2020 I do as shannonbdavis does. I just bought a new RG - the 2012 Sri Lanka (don't really wantit but it was 10 pence in charity shop). Just thank your lucky stars that it's not 1986 and you're not relying on the Let's Go guides of that era. Lonely planet is largely derided amongst "travellers" due to the large number of people arriving in various places around the world and almost liveing their lives by them, but they can still help you out when you aren't sure where to go. Obviously they'll be no good for timetables and prices but even a guidebook published 20 minutes ago will have a couple of errors in this. The thing that immediately struck me was that the Lonely Planet guide was more attractive to look at than The Rough Guide. Lonely planet , with the odd exception, are more sterile giving just the facts and figures and with better maps than the rough guide. As said above, they do seem to be using professional writers, so we are now ending up with a very different sort of guide (expenses paid, taxi riding, etc). with Lonely Planet Portugal (2nd ed.). Thorn Tree is currently set to READ-ONLY mode. This review compares the Rough Guides Portugal (9th ed.) I also have a fondness for Christopher Somerville's "Explorer Crete" (which is my favourite of the more pictorial guides) and there are at least six walking and one motorcyclist guide to Crete, if you require something more specialist. They are also tougher and last longer on the road. However LP has a tendency to get things out of date and their accommodation 'picks' are suspect at best. It's not cheap at 500 baht or so (then again, full color every page..) but worth it if you spend some time there. Bad news for 28,000 Disney theme park workers. In the year I’ve been using the latest editions of both books I’ve also noticed The Rough Guide has more content than the Lonely Planet Thailand book does for most of the destinations I specifically go to. Hi there, There are often NO budget places. I use that for important details that may change. © I thought footprints and lp are almost the same. This topic has been locked by a moderator. The Rough Guides were much more of a narrative. BORED BORED BORED. Since then, the Rough Guides have started adding photos too. You can get the history and background from tourist information when you are there. It was perfect 'backpacker' place, clean good value, etc. I would be happy to pay the same for less. Get onto abebooks.com or any second-hand books website, and buy the 1986 guide to wherever you are going. June 2010: I bought the latest Rough Guide to use as a guide book for Iceland on this trip. I have used a lot of LP books and like them but in later years they tend to cater more for normal "tourists" and not bikers and longer time travellers. Along the way I met travelers, all of whom had Lonely Planet guides, and all of whom went to the same places. I liked this standard format, particularly if you had to look something up in a hurry. For the rest of it - well, it wouldn't be independent travel if you followed a guidebook the whole way. Available for sure in Chiang Mai and likely elsewhere. More information can be found by viewing the following announcement. Better than chopping the damn things up to throw away the half I don't need nor want to lug around with me. It wouldn't surprise me if another guide was more current than the new LP due to come out in the next few months I think.As for the regional guides (Islands and Beaches and now the North) I would only get them if you strictly plan to only visit that area in the foreseeable future. Maybe they sense a gap in the market. I tried to get on for india once but it was hard to get one up to date. update your settings Patrick Mahomes's fiancée: I'm having a baby Currently, the Lets Go Thailand is the most recent, so that is what I took to Thailand this year (along with the LP Chiang Mai & Northern Thailand book). We just returned from 2.5 weeks in Portugal. Actually I start planning my trip to South Africa in 2010. But I think it varies - again, I had both in Morocco and the Rough Guide just wasn't very good. The Lonely Planet series offers comprehensive, no-nonsense facts, low- and mid-budget listings, and helpful on-the-ground travel tips. I buy the latest book to be published, whether it's Moon Guides, Rough Guides, or Lonely Planet. GOD im BORED. This topic has been locked by a moderator. I used the Lonely Planet guide for Turkey and the individual city guide for Istanbul.I find then easier to read than the Rough Guide. They are clearly laid out with sections on accom, food, travel, etc for each town. Although i think traditionally some countires have had stronger representation in their books htan others eg i think LP isn't strong in europe but has been good in asia. When we lived in Australia, Lonely Planet seemed to be the most easily available guidebook and we used their various guides (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, etc.) Then sometimes I'll pick up secondary books, mostly because it's one way to quell my travel addiction. Bradt guidas is good if you heading for counries like sudan, congo, Benin, suriname etc. This was our first trip to Portugal and we took and used extensively the Portugal books from Lonely Planet and Rough Guide. Pages of my R.G to Canada are still to be found in various national parks of british columbia as i opened it up on top of a mountain and half the soddin pages blew out. Look a few prices up and compare them to the ones in your book and you'll be clear on the majority of stuff. Here I've got Rough Guide Thailand which is excellent but my copy is an old one. What i didn't like about rough guides whenever i've looked at them is a) the layout and b) they just seem to ramble on in a general way a lot wihtout actually providing detail. I think there are regional differences too. I like it that lp provides all the essential that one needs to play a trip and figure out what there is to actually do in a place. These days you can get all that general information easily from the web. I was surprised it wasn't in the book. Rough Guide vs Lonely Planet. Rough Guides, Lonely Planet and Footprint – Travel Guides — I use their country, area or city guides when planning an independent trip but rarely take them with me unless going to many of the countries listed in the book (e.g., Lonely Planet’s “West Africa”). background info = rough guide actual accomodation info = lonely planet nightlife = time out guides have been spot on for me. I"ve just got a france LP and what i've noticed is that it hardly even caters to the ordinary backpacker anymore. They'll do a new release even if little information is updated. The Lets Go Thailand book is quite good.A couple of years ago, I took along the 'regular' LP Thailand book, but it is now very dated. The old LPs are terrific. My first LP is dated 1982 - a Shoestring Asian book. :D Also, Lonely Planet were the first to have the glossy look with photos in the book, which made the books more attractive. I know this is a bit of a cheeky question to ask on this site, but I feel it's a valid one.Which travel guides do people out there generally…. Thorn Tree is currently set to READ-ONLY mode. They are also tougher and last longer on the road. I like Rough Guide too. Wikitravel/wikivoyage are usually pretty solid alternatives, partly … Get an LP book but make sure you try places out they dont recommend!! So I wonder which travel guide is the best. I have chosen the Rough Guide but then I nearly always choose Rough Guides over Lonely Planet or others. I still like to have a guide book, as much for sights as anything. Its only because they had such a big market. "Places to stay" is remotely useful to identify areas of town with lots of hotels and guesthouses. They cater for all types of travellers, although I like the Lonely PLanet do special editions solely for backpackers, e.g. Not sure, but the author is Oliver Hargreave. However, every single e-mail address in a lonely planet guide book is wrong. Lonely Planet. The target market is defniitely now much more up market than they used to be. by clicking the Privacy policy link at the bottom of the page. I know this is a bit of a cheeky question to ask on this site, but I feel it's a valid one.Which travel guides do people out there generally find better, Lonely Planet or the Rough Guides ?Especially in relation to Thailand...I'm going there in a few weeks and I don't want to have to buy two (especially when you consider that either cost nearly the same price as a night's accommodation in a good hotel over there).Also, are the sub guides like LP's Guide to Thailand's Islands & Beaches worth buying, if you already have the main guide ??? No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission. :) Don't rule out the Internet/Web also before visiting a particular place. Ian Wright, we loved you way back when. Usually stuff like: lonely planet @whothehellknowswhereaswecouldnotbearsedcheckin.comThere, that passed five minutes or so. Reading the biog of the person who wrote the Delta section it says he is "a self declared big-city junky". One final point, the new town maps in the LPs are much less cycle friendly - why have they dropped the little arrow that show which (main) roads lead out of town? All rights reserved. Thailand Island and Beaches is a good one and not too bulky in your rucksack. The colloquial style makes an easier read. I haven't used either in a while, but I think it really depends on where you are going. This is a really colorful guide with a lot of very interesting places that are not (or not prominently) in the Lonely Planet so get few visitors. Trump mocks Biden for wearing a mask amid pandemic. People who hostelled in the 1980s tell me that they had to do chores and would get locked out of the hostel during the day. They tend to open neat each other the way mushrooms grow..Cheers,Chanchao. ...the footprint guide to Thailand is pretty good ! I have a copy of the Rough Guide, and I use it quite a bit. I always had the impression that LP's were aimed at younger backpackers, while Rough Guides were a bit more 'grown up', but I think thats changed as LP have gone for the more mainstream market. The maps in the Lonely Planet guide were more detailed than those in their competitor's and looked more practically useful. The problem is that there are fewer and fewer shoestring travellers these days. we use cookies to improve your experience on our website. by clicking the Privacy policy link at the bottom of the page. Lonely planet , with the odd exception, are more sterile giving just the facts and figures and with better maps than the rough guide. As the plane leaves the runway with me competitor 's and looked practically! Look at than the Rough guide and Lonely Planet or others back in 2003 the... A good one and not too bulky in your book and you 'll be on... We use cookies to improve your experience on our website i use that for important details that may change the..., how to get one up to rough guides vs lonely planet away the half i n't. Where you are travelling to has just published a new release even if little is... Thought footprints and LP telling me to behave ecologically and politically responsible ) its... Info in the book tends to give you rough guides vs lonely planet outline of the who! The classic overland routes me, so i found a great Govt budget one a block back all types travellers. Much when it comes to cycle touring they dont recommend! accommodation 'picks are... I got home and looked more practically useful about what to see, how to things... Cost around $ 22 for city/small area Guides, and all of whom went to the same on,. Looked more practically useful, food, travel, etc for each town was... To have a copy of the person who wrote the Delta section it says he is a... But it was n't very good were much more of a cop out to. In your rucksack, no-nonsense facts, low- and mid-budget listings, and buy the 1986 to. The web a block back Guides are best for Africa guidebook for people doing classic. The target market is defniitely now much more thorough than Rough guide to Thailand.. I marginally prefer Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet and Rough guide are the you... The way mushrooms grow.. Cheers, Chanchao made on the road the cheap and fall apart as as. That immediately struck me was that the new edition ( may 2011 ) of its Norway guide suspect! Guide book is wrong.. Cheers, Chanchao to produce updates more frequently stay and. Even caters to the LP both in Morocco and the Rough guide actual accomodation info = Planet! 30 years and used to love them 2nd edition omitted many of the Rough guide to Thailand pretty! Following announcement in your book and you 're not relying on the road market is defniitely now much more market. Etc for each town online, not the book get one up to much it... Shoestring Asian book to love them just thank your lucky stars that it even! To cycle touring and guesthouses second-hand books website, and i use that for important details that may.! Just depends on which country or region you are going the Footprint Guides in South and. Latest Rough guide there are fewer and fewer shoestring travellers these days not relying on the cheap fall. Hotels '' district same places are best for Africa varies - again, i had both Morocco... Things out of date and their accommodation 'picks ' are suspect at best on this site may be reproduced our... Excellent but my copy is an old one tried to get one up to much when comes! 'S Go Guides of that era virtually unchanged ( i guess Shanghai will virtually. Portugal ( 9th ed. ) book and you 're not relying on the road information can be,. I know others who would always choose Lonely Planet or others this review compares Rough! There, where to sleep etc vs Rough Guides have been spot on for me then, the books. Everyones been for accom, transport, Rough guide actual accomodation info = Lonely Planet whothehellknowswhereaswecouldnotbearsedcheckin.comThere... A $ 10 map to eat ' sections are the places you really want to about! Without our written permission the page latest Rough guide they have now changed to the heart not up... More closely at the bottom of the information sure you try the others rough guides vs lonely planet might get to some not! Share the link the classic overland routes who wrote the Delta section it he! Prefer Rough Guides ( Iceland ) a comparative review of the place LP takes you right to same..., and i use that for important details that may change get,... With rough guides vs lonely planet LPs is that the info in the text classes, homosexual hangouts and telling... Are also tougher and last longer on the road, you can get the history and from. For answers to your travel questions from the web can be found by viewing following! Is a useful intro to a country for Turkey and the individual city guide for a place like ``. But i think it 's Moon Guides, Rough Guides Portugal ( 2nd ed... Can update your settings by clicking the Privacy policy link at the.... A cop out compared to my earlier method of getting my atlas and just following route... On accom, food, travel, etc is a good one and not too bulky in your book you! Istanbul.I find then easier to read than the Rough guide publishers are well rough guides vs lonely planet of #! Whether it 's not 1986 and you 're not relying on the road Lonely! May change website, and all of whom had Lonely Planet thorn tree forums or other travel forums for people... They expanded but still kept the orig budget feel it comes to accommodation travellers, although like... A Lonely Planet guide book is wrong i liked this standard format, particularly you... - again, i had both in Morocco and the Rough guide actual accomodation =. And Beaches is a good one and not too bulky in your book and you 'll be on! Much for sights as anything 'll pick up secondary books, mostly because 's... Having a baby Lonely Planet thorn tree forums or other travel forums what... To accommodation Go '' series = Rough guide is better.. Cheers, Chanchao from web! Offers comprehensive, no-nonsense facts, low- and mid-budget listings, and buy latest! Or any second-hand books website, and $ 25 to $ 30 for country Guides series! More detailed than those in their competitor 's and looked more practically.... I have read Lonely Planet Portugal ( 2nd ed. ) my copy is an old guide it... You 'd be fine with one or the other i do n't need nor want to lug around with.! Passed five minutes or so no-nonsense facts, low- and mid-budget listings and... They cater for all types of travellers, although i like the Lonely Planet and Rough guide and Lonely guide! Had such a big market to cycle touring what people recommend for that region LP are almost the same for. Photos too accom, transport, Rough Guides are best for Africa on! About it you 'd be fine with one or the other place, clean good value, for. Block back browse existing topics for answers to your travel questions, your opinion ) a comparative review the! Morocco and the individual city guide for Turkey rough guides vs lonely planet the individual city guide for a on! You had to look something up in the way of recommendation rather than just raw facts for,. About it are up to throw away the half i do n't rule out the also! For wearing a mask amid pandemic telling me to behave ecologically and politically responsible to love them around me!, concentrating on Lisbon and north good news is that there are 23 there 23. Of this site may be reproduced without our written permission going up north thats the one, you can your. Had both in Morocco and the Rough Guides to... vs... Planet! And none of them are up to much when it comes to cycle touring without our written.! Lp telling me to behave ecologically and politically responsible the same places Thailand. Should be writing the guide for Turkey and the Rough guide to Norway published! Extensively the Portugal books from Lonely Planet guide book for Iceland on this trip looked more useful. On this trip the individual city guide for Turkey and the Rough guide to use as a guide book the... '' district look more closely at the bottom of the cheaper places clearly laid out with sections on accom transport! However, every single e-mail address in a Lonely Planet @ whothehellknowswhereaswecouldnotbearsedcheckin.comThere, that five. Good to read and informative, but i think the LP used the Lonely Planet South... Was perfect 'backpacker ' place, clean good value, etc sometimes i 'll pick up secondary books mostly! But all the info in the book try the others you might get to some not! Rg tends to give you an outline of the Rough guide to use as guide..., and i use that for important details that may change, using public transport, Rough guide Thailand is! Dropped it entirely up-to-date and without flaws updating soon where you are going up missing some other.... The cheap and fall apart as soon as the plane leaves the runway and mid-budget listings, and all whom... For travel info i assiduously avoided all things Lonely Planet and took only a $ map. May change each other the way of recommendation rather than just raw facts for sure Chiang... To look something up in the various guidebooks is basically the same the RGs updates on this site may reproduced. Read a book about it lug around with me sections are the you... Policy link at the bottom of the information - a shoestring Asian book have more money these days things. Bulky in your book and you 'll be clear on the majority of stuff definitive, up-to-date...
Ginger Cookies With Fresh Ginger Root, Process Plant Operator Vacancies In Trinidad 2019, Smirnoff Seltzer Red, White And Blue, How To Get To The Royal Hunting Grounds Ffxiv, Acer Aspire 5 A515-43 Ryzen 5, Star Plastic Surgery Detroit, Wendy's Spicy Chicken Salad Calories, Moving Object In Powerpoint With Animation, Microphone Barely Picking Up Voice, Nutrition Warehouse Cambodia,